Remote Deposit Capture RSS Feed
Remote Deposit Capture Newsletter
Remote Deposit Capture Group on LinkedIn
Remote Deposit Capture Group onTwitter
The Green Sheet

Email Page 
Print Page 
 Add to LinkedIn Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to StumbleUpon 
Add to Tumblr
Search discussion boards: 

Remote Deposit Capture Discussion Boards

The Remote Deposit Capture Discussion Boards are open to the entire industry. Post comments, share news, ask questions and more with professionals from throughout the industry.
Go back to Discussion Boards
Remote Deposit Capture Discussions Discuss the ins-&-outs of Remote Deposit Capture here. No vendor solicitations here please.
Discussion Boards > Remote Deposit Capture Discussions > New R/T needs to be added to validation tables View modes: 
User avatar
Member
Member
tgavin - 6/2/2020 10:13:07 AM
   
New R/T needs to be added to validation tables
The Bancorp Bank recently added a second r/t on which customers can write checks.  We're hearing that some mobile deposit apps are not accepting these checks for deposit and are indicating that the r/t on the item does not match or is not valid. 
I am looking for help in reaching out to any capture vendor that may need to add this r/t to its validation tables. 
The number in question is 031101334.
The r/t can be verified through the Fed if needed.  Hopefully most providers are updating regularly with the latest Fed records however we're finding that some do not.

Any help in spreading the word on this would be greatly appreciated!
 

User avatar
Member
Member
Bsaffici - 6/2/2020 3:47:13 PM
   
RE:New R/T needs to be added to validation tables
I find it unusal that the mobile application is searching a table of "all" RTs. Normally, validation using the Check Digit Validation routine is sufficient. I performed the CDV on this number and it is valid.  I also searched the FED ACH RT table and it is listed there. I menton that becaue if a RT was issued for checks only, it might not be in the ACH table and if the vendor used that table then it possibly wouldn't be found. In my opinion, there should not be a reason to validate the RT through a full RT search table. That is the practice in Canada but rare in the US. Even after the point of validation, the determination of how to route an item isn't throguh a full RT search table. Hope that helps.

User avatar
Member
Member
tgavin - 6/3/2020 10:29:05 AM
   
RE:New R/T needs to be added to validation tables
Helpful, yes.  Thank you for your input!

User avatar
Member
Member
lfahey - 6/25/2020 3:41:24 PM
   
RE:New R/T needs to be added to validation tables
Bancorp Bank resolve this issue?  We have another bank client that has the same problem with a new R/T.  Multiple depository banks are rejecting it even after the new R/T was live for 2 months.

Recent Forum Posts

6 Business Opportunities in the Solution Finder Pipeline

The launch of our new & improved Solution Finder service is going very well... We currently have over 20 Solution Providers participating, 3 Publishing Partners, have closed 1 Verified Business Opportunity, and have 6 more business opportunities in the pipeline! -And all of this just since Ju...
Posted on 7/2/2020 1:30:03 PM


RE:New R/T needs to be added to validation tables

Bancorp Bank resolve this issue?  We have another bank client that has the same problem with a new R/T.  Multiple depository banks are rejecting it even after the new R/T was live for 2 months.
Posted on 6/25/2020 3:41:24 PM


RE:Solution Finder Opportunity: Business i/s/o Bank-Agnostic Solution

6/22 Update: 5 Solution Providers who participate in the Solution Finder Network were put in touch with the contact at this opportunity. The organization is evaluating these solution providers and will likely be selecting one in the next couple of weeks. More to come.
Posted on 6/22/2020 5:26:10 PM