Remote Deposit Capture RSS Feed
Remote Deposit Capture Newsletter
Remote Deposit Capture Group on LinkedIn
Remote Deposit Capture Group onTwitter
The Green Sheet

Email Page 
Print Page 
 Add to LinkedIn Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to StumbleUpon 
Add to Tumblr
Search discussion boards: 

Remote Deposit Capture Discussion Boards

The Remote Deposit Capture Discussion Boards are open to the entire industry. Post comments, share news, ask questions and more with professionals from throughout the industry.
Go back to Discussion Boards
Remote Deposit Capture Discussions Discuss the ins-&-outs of Remote Deposit Capture here. No vendor solicitations here please.
Discussion Boards > Remote Deposit Capture Discussions > USAA Patents View modes: 
User avatar
Site admin
Site admin
John - 1/17/2020 10:58:37 AM
   
RE:USAA v Wells Fargo, Trial #2 Coverage
DigitalTransactions posted an article discussing the basics of the recent verdict. Of interesting note was the following;

Insurer and financial-services provider United Services Automobile Association on Wednesday asked a federal court to dismiss a request by mobile remote deposit capture technology developer Mitek Systems Inc. for a declaratory judgment that Mitek’s technology does not infringe on four USAA patents.


To read the full article, CLICK HERE.

User avatar
Site admin
Site admin
John - 1/23/2020 5:08:50 PM
   
NAFCU Video covering USAA v Wells Fargo Patent Suit
Here is a link to a freely-accessible 8-minute vimeo video covering this case...
Click Here for the NAFCU Video
Of slightly interesting note...
  • Patent violations / cases will not be resolved anytime soon.
  • "Worst-case scenario" is additional litigation or FIs need to license from USAA
  • Credit Unions need to work with their vendors to ensure they are indemnified against patent lawsuits.
...But I think we all already knew this.

User avatar
Site admin
Site admin
John - 1/31/2020 2:51:45 PM
   
Mitek CEO Comments on USAA Patents
Mitek's CEO, Max Carnecchia, made the following comments during a conference call on Jan. 30, 2020;

"USAA first sued Wells Fargo for patent infringement based on four patents that all relate to an image auto capture feature on a mobile device. Before the trial, Wells Fargo requested that the U.S. Patent Office perform an additional review of all four patents. Subsequently, USAA dropped two of the four patents from their lawsuit.

At trial, a jury in the Eastern District of Texas found that Wells Fargo infringed at least one of the two remaining patents, but did not specify which. Wells Fargo will likely appeal the decision. That process could take 18 months or more. Following the jury verdict in November, the U.S. Patent Office agreed to review three of the four patents. It is important to understand that the standard the U.S. Patent Office uses in determining to review patents is that they must believe that there is a reasonable likelihood that at least one of the claims in that patent is invalid. So the Patent Office believes at least one of the claims in each of the three patents they will review is invalid.

The Patent Office must complete their review within 12 months. The Patent Office rejected Wells Fargo's request to review the fourth patent. The rejection does not, however, prohibit Mitek or any other party other than Wells Fargo, from requesting a review of this patent with additional information. If the Patent Office invalidates the two patents that issued before the end of the appeals process, then Wells Fargo would not have infringed, as the patents would be invalid.

Alternatively, if one or some of the claims are invalidated, the Federal Appeals Court could decide to reman the case for retrial since the jury did not specify which claim or claims of the two patents was infringed. Of course, none of this matters if the Appeals Court overturns the entire judgment on appeal. Separately, Mitek filed an action against USAA on the same four patents in California, seeking a declaratory judgment from the court that Mitek's products do not infringe those patents. Mitek invented all of its core technology, and our products do not infringe on any USAA patents.

We view the DJ action as an important step to provide certainty to our customers concerning the use of our technology and we intend to vigorously defend their use of our product. The DJ process could take 18 months or more to complete. Lastly, USAA filed a second lawsuit against Wells Fargo, which originally involved five USAA patents related to remote deposit solutions. In that litigation, USAA dropped two of the patents, and the judge in the case found that one of the remaining three patents was invalid.

USAA won a jury verdict in January on the remaining two patents. It is our understanding that no Mitek product was accused of infringing either of the two patents in question as litigation involved broad banking processes and not Mitek's specific mobile deposit features. We believe that Wells Fargo will likely appeal the January verdict as well."
-end of quote-


User avatar
Site admin
Site admin
John - 2/5/2020 4:01:36 PM
   
Strategy Lessons From Wells Fargo Fintech Patent Litigation
The following article provided by Farella, Braun & Martel, and authored by Ashleigh Nickerson on JDSupra.com, provides an insightful look at lessons learned from the USAA v Wells Fargo cases, and strategies when dealing with Fintech Partners.

Click below to read the article...

Strategy Lessons From Wells Fargo Fintech Patent Litigation


1 2

Recent Forum Posts

RE:Alternatives to in person site vists

We only do sites visits for high risk cusotmers based on an internal scoring methodology.  New clients that have been onboarded within the current year are visited but a drive by is sufficient.  We share best practices with the client as part of the annual audit and this can be done vir...
Posted on 1/5/2021 4:09:25 PM


RE:Alternatives to in person site vists

We are currently using a visual review of the stores. We need to have certain disclosures, CFPB information etc. to be visible by state. The merchant (agent) is required to complete a questionaire wiht our staff prior.
Posted on 1/5/2021 3:19:35 PM


RE:Alternatives to in person site vists

We have some data on what the industry has done regarding site visits... Look for an article later this month!
Posted on 1/5/2021 1:50:53 PM