RE:New R/T needs to be added to validation tables
I find it unusal that the mobile application is searching a table of "all" RTs. Normally, validation using the Check Digit Validation routine is sufficient. I performed the CDV on this number and it is valid. I also searched the FED ACH RT table and it is listed there. I menton that becaue if a RT was issued for checks only, it might not be in the ACH table and if the vendor used that table then it possibly wouldn't be found. In my opinion, there should not be a reason to validate the RT through a full RT search table. That is the practice in Canada but rare in the US. Even after the point of validation, the determination of how to route an item isn't throguh a full RT search table. Hope that helps.
|